Rankings

BigLaw associates like rankings. Not just because they are prestige whores (which they are), but because without rankings all the whoring means nothing. They like to review publications, websites, US News, American Lawyer and any other such “authoritative” sources that contain ranking systems, no matter how invalid. They do this so they can compare themselves with other BigLaw associates at other BigLaw firms. They compare salaries (and now with the recent raise to $160 starting, they compare bonuses), they compare overall rankings on AmLaw 100, the PPPs, the random ass rankings such as: top firm in M&A deals involving companies that breed monkeys, or top firm in energy deals involving companies whose names begin with the letter “R”. It doesn’t matter that their rankings don’t really matter or justify the abuse we take day in and day out, because they give us something to talk loudly about, brag about, complain about in bars, on gchat, on greedyassociates, on ATL comments sections, etc.

We like rankings because these little numbers give us a reason to be a pompous little jackass. Without them, we would probably still be pompous little jackasses, but now, we can not only be so but also recite really loudly our importance and the rankings that we think justifies it.

Update: US News is considering changes to the rankings formula.  See Race to the Bottom for additional coverage.

Advertisements

One Response

  1. Whatever. You are a rankings whore too. Everyone is. Except for those in ttt law schools.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: